A History of Covid Absurdities

Dr. Martin Kulldorff (Harvard) presented these observations over the early pandemic years of the 20s.

NIH director Collins and NIAID Director Fauci think you promote science by silencing scientists through public takedowns
A geneticist (Collins) and a virologist (Fauci) thinking they know epidemiology better than epidemiologists at Oxford, Harvard and Stanford calling them "fringe epidemiologists".
Lockdowns to protect low-risk members of the laptop class instead of focused protection of older high-risk people. This mistake lead to many unnecessary deaths in both groups.
People pretending to care for the global poor favored lockdowns that have caused more harm to poor people around the world than war and slavery.
Working class people who opposed the devastating lockdowns were branded right-wing extremists.
Scientists signing and Lancet publishing a petition questioning natural immunity after Covid recovery, even though we have known about natural immunity since the Athenian plague in 430 B.C.
A CDC director (Redfield) who believes face masks provide better protection against Covid than vaccines.
A CDC director (Walensky) who questions natural immunity after rcovery from an infectious disease.
Firing people with natural immunity after Covid recovery, even though they are the least likely to spread Covid to others.
CDC fired Kulldorff for being too pro-vaccine. viz. advising not to halt the J&J for the age group over 50.
BigTech censoring epidemiologists who got the pandemic right, while promoting those who got it wrong as Covid experts.
Zero Covid.

Alternatives to absurdities

Navigation